A sa¹ú¼Ê´«Ã½ family has lost its bid before sa¹ú¼Ê´«Ã½’s Civil Resolution Tribunal to have Air sa¹ú¼Ê´«Ã½ compensate it for flight delays resulting from damage to a plane.
The couple and three children purchased flights from Edmonton to Vancouver.
However, the flight from Edmonton to Vancouver was delayed so they sought $2,000 for compensation under the Air Passenger Protection Regulations and $90.91 for additional rental car expenses due to the flight delay.
Air sa¹ú¼Ê´«Ã½ said the delay was due to an unforeseen maintenance issue that created a knock-on effect on flights, said his Sept. 25 decision.
As such, the airline said, the family is not entitled to compensation for the delay.
Air sa¹ú¼Ê´«Ã½ also said it paid the applicants $90.91 for rental car expenses and said that portion of the claim should be dismissed.
Henderson said that, on May 21, 2023, Air sa¹ú¼Ê´«Ã½ notified the family that AC245 on May 22, 2023 would be delayed due to additional time needed to substitute the aircraft.
He said AC245 was the return flight of AC240, which flew from Vancouver to Edmonton. The aircraft used on AC240 and AC245 was a Boeing 737.
Air sa¹ú¼Ê´«Ã½ said the scheduling conflict was caused by the knock-on effect of another Boeing 737 (FIN 517) that required unscheduled maintenance for safety reasons.
On May 20, 2023, aircraft FIN 517’s winglet was damaged while parked.
“The damaged winglet required repair. This unscheduled maintenance affected the availability of Air sa¹ú¼Ê´«Ã½’s fleet of Boeing 737s,” Henderson said.
He accepted Air sa¹ú¼Ê´«Ã½’s evidence that the delay was caused by a shortage of aircraft arising from unscheduled maintenance of FIN 517 that posed a safety issue.

Henderson said Air sa¹ú¼Ê´«Ã½’s evidence showed the unscheduled maintenance was required for safety purposes and that there were no reasonable measures the company could have taken to mitigate the impact.
The families’ names were anonymized to protect the children’s identities.