Immigration, Refugees and Citizenship sa国际传媒 (IRCC) has announced .
In 2024, IRCC aims to issue 360,000 study permits, a 35-per-cent reduction from 2023. This announcement comes on the heels of a doubling of the cost-of-living requirement, whereby international students coming to study in any province except Québec have to demonstrate they have .
There is no doubt that and have acted unethically, and steps must be taken to address their actions.
International students also deserve access to supports and services they need to thrive in sa国际传媒.
But dominant media narratives illustrated in headlines like “” are inaccurate and harmful. They also shift responsibility away from those truly responsible: Elected officials at all levels of the government and predatory private colleges.
Baseless blame
Media coverage of the cap has also failed to consider the people at the heart of the issue — the international students themselves who, despite their , are being blamed for many of .
The media has also reported on the cap’s which, for years, have commodified international students, viewing them as an important revenue source in the face of .
These stories have focused on how this policy will have a dire impact on the of universities, and how they might be forced to hike domestic/Canadian students’ tuition, which will adversely affect Canadians.
This ignores the impact on international students themselves, who have been exploited by provinces and universities for years and .
Some editorialists have argued the cap on visas and stricter work-permit rules will
The federal government has committed to creating a that will see institutions set higher standards for supports, services and outcomes for international students and fast-track study permits.
Likewise, several provinces have committed to .
But there are other ways to prevent the exploitation of international students, including and creating inclusive learning environments.
Who’s responsible for the housing crisis?
The government’s official news release, along with the of the announcement, continues to for some of sa国际传媒’s biggest challenges, stating that rapid increases in the number of international students arriving in sa国际传媒 put “”
This is neither accurate nor fair. It’s overly simplistic, untrue and xenophobic.
Read more:
sa国际传媒’s housing availability and affordability crisis has been decades long in the making. the housing bubble was caused by a confluence of factors including municipal, provincial/territorial and , municipal zoning laws, developers’ interests and central bank policies.
Immigration Minister Marc Miller himself has said because they bring skilled labour into the country.
By overly focusing on demand for housing — and scapegoating immigrants and international students — the government is drawing attention away from immediate actions it could take to increase supply.
The majority of international students cannot afford to compete with Canadians for homes or for rentals.
on Punjabi international students has found many students can only afford to spend a few hundred dollars a month on rent, forcing them to live in , or to .
These students aren’t the primary driver of rising home prices or rental costs in sa国际传媒, and doubt the cap will have any impact on rental prices.
Who’s responsible for health-care crisis?
International students are also being blamed for health-care challenges, despite sa国际传媒’s health-care system being significantly strained since the onset of the COVID-19 pandemic — a time when there was a massive decrease of international students coming to sa国际传媒.
Read more:
In fact, most Canadians believe our provincial/territorial health-care systems have been in decline for more than a decade due to .
The College of Family Physicians of sa国际传媒 has been sounding alarm bells for years about sa国际传媒’s need for more family physicians .
In its recent , the organization states the most pressing needs for family doctors today include higher remuneration and reduced administrative burdens. International students — or immigrants, more broadly — aren’t named anywhere.
That the federal government is blaming international students for “putting pressure” on the health-care system is both a misrepresentation and an abdication of responsibility.
Replicating power, privilege
The cap, as well as the new financial requirements for international students, represent the federal government’s attempt to solve some of the pressing challenges in an ecosystem they helped create.
As Lisa Brunner, an immigration scholar at the University of British Columbia, argues, there are involved in the ties that bind migration and education. International students will be shut out of sa国际传媒 due to these new policies, which will ultimately replicate power and privilege.
This pattern of scapegoating in government rhetoric and in media coverage is deeply troubling. It’s already affecting , and may spill over to create negative attitudes and behaviour toward immigrants and international students themselves.
Understandably, and speaking out against the .
Read more:
It is the responsibility of all levels of government to fix the issues they’ve helped create. This requires taking swift steps to effectively crack down on , and significantly increase government grants to public universities and colleges.
The government must also invest in health care and create affordable housing.
International students have not created these problems, and the government and media must stop blaming them.
Leah Hamilton receives funding from SSHRC.
Yvonne Su does not work for, consult, own shares in or receive funding from any company or organization that would benefit from this article, and has disclosed no relevant affiliations beyond their academic appointment.
