sa国际传媒

Skip to content
Join our Newsletter

Who鈥檚 Suing Whom: May 31, 2023

The latest from the sa国际传媒 Supreme Court
lawcourts-2020-web-cc
The sa国际传媒 Supreme Court in Vancouver

These corporate claims were filed with the sa国际传媒 Supreme Court registry in Vancouver.

Information is derived from notices of civil claim. Civil claims have not been tested or proven in court. 

Defendant

Cloudpermit Inc.

Plaintiff

Paul Hollas

Claim

Damages for wrongful dismissal as the defendant’s sales manager for North America.

Defendants

Ledcor Construction Ltd. and Hoopp Realty Inc./Les Immeubles Hoopp Inc. and The sa国际传媒 Life Assurance Company/La Compagnie D’Assurance du sa国际传媒 Sur la Vie

Plaintiff

Pacific Blasting & Demolition Ltd.

Claim

$209,030 to cover a lien on a Vancouver property for breach of contract for failing to pay in full for the plaintiff’s work as a subcontractor doing demolition work.

Defendant

Advanced Intelligent Systems Inc.

Plaintiff

Fasken Martineau DuMoulin LLP

Claim

$133,592 for unpaid bills for legal services provided by the plaintiff to the defendant.

Defendant

Triad Pro Innovators Inc.

Plaintiff

Frontier Power Products ULC

Claim

Damages for breach of a non-disclosure agreement and loss of profit after the defendants shared the plaintiff’s proprietary information leading to the creation of a substantially identical product to the plaintiff’s generator sets and portable mobile light towers by a competitor.

Defendants

Ardent Strategies LLC doing business as Source Path Digital and Christopher O’Neill and Darrel O’Neill and Chad Hornbuckle and Laurence-Marie (Laurie) Etienne and Monique Robinson and Jennifer Whiteaker and ABC Company #1 and ABC Company #2 and John Doe #1 and John Doe #2 and Jane Doe #1 and Jane Doe #2

Plaintiff

Antarctica Digital Marketing Inc. doing business as Future Flow Media

Claim

Damages for conspiracy and breach of agreement after the defendants, one of whom worked as an independent contractor for the plaintiff, stole the plaintiff’s trade secrets to run a competing business and claimed to the plaintiff’s customers that the plaintiff was now operating under the name Source Path Digital.