sa¹ú¼Ê´«Ã½

Skip to content
Join our Newsletter

Editorial: A ban on trophy-hunting

Hunting is a way of life for many British Columbians, and well-crafted game regulations are an important part of wildlife management. But there’s something disturbing about trophy hunting.

Hunting is a way of life for many British Columbians, and well-crafted game regulations are an important part of wildlife management.

But there’s something disturbing about trophy hunting.

A First Nations group announced a ban on trophy-bear hunting along parts of sa¹ú¼Ê´«Ã½â€™s coast last year, and says it is preparing to enforce that ban this year.

Native peoples have traditionally had a reverential relationship with wild animals, but apart from cultural considerations, the bears are worth more alive than dead to the First Nations people, many of whom are part of a growing ecotourism industry that includes bear-watching.

According to the Guide Outfitters Association of sa¹ú¼Ê´«Ã½, hunting brings about $116 million worth of economic activity to the province each year. According to the Wilderness Tourism Association of sa¹ú¼Ê´«Ã½, ecotourism here is worth about $1.5 billion a year.

The Forests and Lands Ministry doesn’t support the trophy-hunting ban, saying sa¹ú¼Ê´«Ã½â€™s bear population is well managed and is not threatened by hunting.

But it’s not just about the numbers.

Trophy hunters go for the biggest and the best, as opposed to natural predation, which tends to take the weakest and the slowest, thereby helping to improve the gene pool.

A bearskin on the wall gives a hunter bragging rights, but shooting a bear with a high-powered rifle equipped with a telescopic sight is an unequal contest, and a hide and a head are all that’s left of the bear.

A framed photo is a better trophy — it helps preserve the experience of watching a bear in its habitat, and the bear is no worse off.