sa国际传媒

Skip to content
Join our Newsletter

Editorial: Elizabeth May is not above the law

Elizabeth May has every right 鈥 even an obligation as leader of the Green Party of sa国际传媒 and MP for Saanich-Gulf Islands 鈥 to oppose and protest the Trans Mountain Pipeline project. It would be against her principles to do otherwise.
Trans Mountain May 20180500.jpg
Green Party Leader Elizabeth May, front, and one of her lawyers Alexander Ejsmony walk together outside sa国际传媒 Supreme Court, in Vancouver. She pleaded guilty to a criminal contempt of court charge for violating an injunction at a Kinder Morgan work site. May 28, 2018

Elizabeth May has every right 鈥 even an obligation as leader of the Green Party of sa国际传媒 and MP for Saanich-Gulf Islands 鈥 to oppose and protest the Trans Mountain Pipeline project. It would be against her principles to do otherwise.

But thumbing her nose at the courts shouldn鈥檛 be part of her job.

May was fined $1,500 by a sa国际传媒 Supreme Court judge Monday for violating his injunction preventing people from protesting within five metres of two work sites in Burnaby. He said his order preserved the right to peaceful, lawful and safe protests, but May chose to protest at a main gate to Kinder Morgan鈥檚 pipeline terminal to maximize media exposure.

The judge said May exploited her position as an MP to encourage others to break the law. He also said that as a lawyer, May has a responsibility to obey his order and persuade others to do so.

Outside court, May said she respects the judge鈥檚 decision, but said she believes there鈥檚 a place for non-violent civil disobedience in a democracy.

Perhaps she should have read a briefing document prepared by the legal and social affairs division of the Parliamentary Information and Research Service.

鈥淚n sa国际传媒, all citizens are subject to the ordinary laws of general application, both criminal and civil,鈥 says the document. 鈥淭here is no exemption for parliamentarians, nor is there any immunity or special rights related to their parliamentary functions, outside the narrowly defined application of parliamentary privilege.鈥

We don鈥檛 believe May should lose her seat, and there鈥檚 zero chance it would happen anyway, but she should perhaps consider what would happen if everyone decided to be selective about the laws they obeyed.