sa¹ú¼Ê´«Ã½

Skip to content
Join our Newsletter

Editorial: Rethink the border fee

A U.S. proposal for a border-crossing fee isn’t meant to be an attack on Canadians, but it’s still a poor idea. The U.S. Department of Homeland Security is asking Congress to authorize study of a fee to be charged people who enter the U.S. by land.

A U.S. proposal for a border-crossing fee isn’t meant to be an attack on Canadians, but it’s still a poor idea.

The U.S. Department of Homeland Security is asking Congress to authorize study of a fee to be charged people who enter the U.S. by land. (Airline passengers already pay an entry fee.) Janet Napolitano, secretary of homeland security, says her department needs to find more revenue to pay for new border guards and increasingly expensive border operations.

The idea has created a fuss in sa¹ú¼Ê´«Ã½ — where the majority of the population lives within 160 kilometres of the U.S. border — and in northern states where local economies depend on cross-border traffic. Critics say the fee will hurt businesses and will do more harm than good. A silver lining for Canadian retailers would be the dimming of enthusiasm for cross-border shopping, but it would also inhibit American tourist travel to sa¹ú¼Ê´«Ã½.

And it would be just plain unneighbourly. It’s the longest border in the world shared by two countries, and it doesn’t need massive military installations to protect it. Charging admission would seem to violate the spirit.

But don’t panic yet — the plan needs the approval of the U.S. Congress, and the vast majority of the 350 million crossings into the U.S. each year involve its border with Mexico. American politicians won’t pay much attention to Canadian angst, but they are becoming increasingly sensitive to issues affecting the Latino vote. They wouldn’t likely favour turning their country into the home of the brave and the land of the fee.