sa国际传媒

Skip to content
Join our Newsletter

Kansas is close to banning gender-affirming care for minors as GOP leaders seek the last vote

TOPEKA, Kan.
20240314190336-65f38a74df90154b515c2febjpeg
Kansas Senate President Ty Masterson, left, R-Andover, confers with Vice President Richard Wilborn, R-McPherson, during the Senate's session, Thursday, March 14, 2024, at the Statehouse in Topeka, Kan. Republican lawmakers are close to being able to enact a ban on gender-affirming care for minors over an expected veto by Democratic Gov. Laura Kelly. (AP Photo/John Hanna)

TOPEKA, Kan. (AP) 鈥 Republican legislators in Kansas are close to banning gender-affirming care for minors over the Democratic governor鈥檚 expected veto after winning over previously skeptical GOP colleagues, fueling fears that success will encourage further attempts to roll back transgender rights.

Supporters were confident Thursday that the Republican-controlled Senate would approve a bill that would bar health care providers from treating a child鈥檚 gender dysphoria with puberty blockers, hormone treatments and surgery and strip doctors who violate the ban of their licenses. But GOP leaders wanted to send the bill to Gov. Laura Kelly with the two-thirds majority necessary to override her veto later, and so after planning a final vote for Thursday, they canceled it in hopes of rewriting some of its language to lock in the last vote.

鈥淚t's close enough,鈥 said Senate President Ty Masterson, a Wichita-area Republican, predicting final passage next week.

The bill already passed the GOP-controlled House , so the Senate鈥檚 approval would send it to Kelly.

At least 23 other states with Republican legislatures have restricted or banned gender-affirming care for minors. Kansas lawmakers attempted to pass a ban last year, but GOP supporters in the Senate failed to override Kelly鈥檚 veto of a bill last year by a single vote 鈥 and three Republicans voted 鈥渘o鈥 then.

Republicans said the issue is making sure that minors receiving hormone treatment now can phase out those treatments, rather than stopping them immediately, in part to avoid legal problems. Senators would have to get the House to vote to agree on any change.

That decision to try to lock in a two-thirds majority in the Senate before a veto after supporters had a net gain of 12 votes in favor of a ban Wednesday compared with the vote on it last year. Including supporters who were absent Wednesday, backers appeared to have a two-thirds majority in the House.

鈥淲hen I was out and about last summer and last fall, and the number of emails and the number of calls that I had, I didn鈥檛 have a single one tell me to vote the same as I did last year,鈥 state Rep. Susan Concannon, a Republican from western Kansas, said Thursday.

While supporters say they鈥檙e concerned about protecting children, the Kansas bill has stoked fears among transgender adults and LGBTQ+ advocates that GOP lawmakers will follow other GOP-led states and seek more restrictions next year.

While Ohio鈥檚 state government last month limiting care for adults, a aimed at care for children also restricted care for adults 鈥 as did a .

鈥淭he goalposts are not firm,鈥 said Iridescent Riffel, a 27-year-old transgender Lawrence resident and LGBTQ+ rights activist who鈥檚 worked against the bill. 鈥淭hey will always continue to be moved further and further right.鈥

Opponents of such restrictions in Kansas already have promised a legal challenge if they are enacted. Courts elsewhere have blocked enforcement of bans in , Idaho and Montana but allowed their enforcement in Alabama .

Laws restricting or banning gender-affirming care are out of step with the recommendations of major U.S. medical groups, including the American Medical Association and the American Academy of Pediatrics. And providers of the care say it saves lives by lessening depression and anxiety that can lead to suicide.

Young transgender adults and parents of transgender or non-binary children from Kansas further told lawmakers that gender-affirming is vital to their health, adding that providers didn鈥檛 rush their decisions and were clear about potential side effects.

Anthony Alvarez, a 20-year-old transgender University of Kansas student, said he had to wait several months after a doctor was willing to prescribe his testosterone treatments to undergo an additional evaluation to confirm he was sure about wanting them.

He had looked forward to his voice deepening and growing facial hair and hopes to have the double mastectomy known as 鈥渢op surgery鈥 in December. He said he鈥檚 much happier since his transition because the depression and anxiety that marked his life before have waned.

鈥淭hose aren鈥檛 things that are causing the gender dysphoria. They鈥檙e being caused by the gender dysphoria 鈥 the reaction to a world that is kind of hostile towards you,鈥 he said in an interview.

Yet Republican lawmakers portray puberty blockers and hormone treatments as too risky for children. Top Republican House leaders in Kansas said in a statement Wednesday that they were preventing irreversible harm from 鈥渆xperimental鈥 treatments.

The bill's backers cited a from the National Health Service in England, saying 鈥渢here is not enough evidence鈥 that puberty blockers are safe and effective to 鈥渕ake the treatment routinely available,鈥 something U.S. care providers dispute. The NHS statement followed the NHS set last year.

In a meeting of GOP senators early Thursday, Senate Health Committee Chair Beverly Gossage, a Kansas City-area Republican, led a short briefing on the bill with, 鈥淚t鈥檚 talking about children.鈥

John Hanna, The Associated Press