ANTIGONISH, N.S. 鈥� A Nova Scotia small claims adjudicator has likened a dispute over damage to a student rental house as something that could have been included in the 1978 movie 鈥淎nimal House.鈥�
As a result, eight former tenants of the house in Antigonish, N.S., are now on the hook for nearly $6,000 in damages following a written decision released Friday by adjudicator Raffi Balmanoukian.
In his ruling, Balmanoukian draws similarities to the National Lampoon comedy featuring the late John Belushi. It features a troublemaking fraternity in what has been described as the original frat house party movie.
鈥淢issing from that classic, perhaps is a storyline in which the homeowner and inhabitants confront each other about the state of the dwelling in which much of the action takes place,鈥� wrote Balmanoukian. 鈥淚f such a scene there had been, I expect it would have looked something like this dispute.鈥�
The adjudicator characterized the photographic evidence of the state of the house as showing a 鈥減igsty.鈥� He noted that the lawyer for the tenants 鈥渄id not disagree.鈥�
The home was described as a rental property 鈥渢argeted to, and 鈥� rented by college students 鈥� several at a time.鈥� Antigonish is home to St. Francis Xavier University.
According to landlords Emily and Rick Wilson, the house was 鈥渧irtually destroyed鈥� aesthetically, with siding, window and door damage as well as 鈥渃opious amounts of garbage and debris.鈥�
They also told the court the sump pump cistern was used as a 鈥渢rash can鈥� for a makeshift bar in the basement, resulting in it burning out.
Balmanoukian noted a series of photos submitted as evidence that included one showing the sump pump cistern full of cans and various 鈥渞ed Solo cups鈥� and another bundle of photos showing abandoned exterior furniture, including a doorless fridge and a 鈥減rincess-and-the-pea鈥� stack of mattresses.
Other photos showed exterior garbage 鈥渟ome bagged and some not鈥� on a deck and in a shed along with at least one beer keg.
Emily Wilson testified the RCMP were called to the property two or three times and at least one occasion for a violation of COVID-19 gathering limits that were then in effect.
The tenants argued that while the property needed cleaning and some items were left behind, the state of the property 鈥渨asn鈥檛 that bad鈥� when they left it at the end of April 2022.
Only one of the eight tenants testified and admitted responsibility on behalf of the group for the cleaning of the property and for melted siding from a barbecue, but nothing else.
Under cross-examination he said the tenants 鈥渄id a couple of quick cleans鈥� before vacating and had kept the property in a 鈥渞easonable state.鈥�
Balmanoukian disagreed and after applying the $2,100 security deposit to the overall bill, awarded the landlord $5,932.27 to help cover the costs for such things as cleaning, garbage removal, painting, plumbing and siding repair.
鈥淚f the tenants believe they bear different levels of responsibility, that will be for themselves to resolve by way of claims or crossclaims between themselves,鈥� the adjudicator concluded.
鈥淚 hope they emerge from this with an enhanced sense of their own responsibility, and more cognizant of what should be their own self-respect.鈥�
This report by The Canadian Press was first published Aug. 7, 2023.
鈥� By Keith Doucette in Halifax
The Canadian Press
