Scientists studying plant life around the extinction event that killed the dinosaurs have made a surprising discovery: Out of all the birds living at the time, only the ground-dwelling species survived.
The finding, described in the journal Current Biology, reveals how the avian winners and losers in the wake of the Cretaceous-Paleogene extinction event shaped the evolution of all the birds we see today.
The asteroid that struck Earth about 66 million years ago was a 150-kilometre-wide killer rock that smashed into the Yucatan Peninsula so hard that it levelled trees within a 1,500-km radius and radiated so much heat that it probably ignited wildfires worldwide, the study authors said. That鈥檚 not to mention the acid rain as well as the release of so much soot that it snuffed out sunlight, starving plants of the photons they needed to make food and causing significant cooling of the climate.
鈥淭his phase of suppressed sunlight, notoriously difficult to reconstruct, is supported by the proliferation of saprotrophs thriving on decomposing organic matter,鈥� the study authors wrote.
The dinosaurs were entirely wiped out 鈥� except for their descendants, birds, which went on to recover and diversify. Tiny hovering hummingbirds, enormous albatrosses, ground-dwelling ostriches, seafaring penguins and every feathered creature in between owe their existence to those birds that made it through that extinction event.
Scientists have long wondered whether some birds succeeded while others succumbed, and what gave those particular survivors an edge. Some have suggested that those with toothless beaks were better at eating seeds and grains, which would have more easily survived in the apocalyptic landscape than the plants that made them. But previous work has shown that animals with toothed bills were still capable of seed-eating, too. Others have pointed out that a post-asteroid world probably favoured smaller birds over larger ones partly because they鈥檇 need less food to survive. Such factors may have played a role but don鈥檛 offer a full explanation, the researchers said.
For this paper, an international team of scientists used statistical methods to reconstruct the ancient ancestors of living bird groups. They combined it with a study of the fossil plant and spore record, in an effort to see what survived the asteroid and what didn鈥檛.
The scientists found that there was a spike in the amount of fern spores after the asteroid hit. That鈥檚 a telling discovery because ferns tend to take over when a forest canopy has been levelled.
鈥淔erns are pioneer re-colonizers of devastated landscapes, and their proliferation represents a classic example of a 鈥榙isaster flora鈥� composed of taxa capable of rapidly germinating from spores and rhizomes and/or roots,鈥� the study authors wrote.
The trees, then, must have been lost. Any birds that had to live exclusively in those trees, the authors say, would have gone extinct as well.
This seems to match with their reconstructions, which show that the birds that survived the extinction event had ground-dwelling features, such as relatively long legs. It was only after forests started to re-emerge that birds could start to fill 鈥渁rboreal鈥� niches once more.
鈥淭he numerous independent transitions toward arboreality across the neornithine tree of life 鈥� including ancient transitions within major clades such as Strisores (hummingbirds, nightjars, and kin), Otidimorphae, Columbimorphae (pigeons and kin), and Inopinaves 鈥� took place subsequent to the K-Pg transition, presumably after global forests had rebounded from their devastation following the asteroid impact,鈥� the study authors wrote.
The findings might help researchers better understand the evolution of birds and also shed light on the plight of birds today, whose populations have been threatened by human activity, the scientists pointed out.
鈥淭oday, avian community diversity is negatively influenced by loss of plant diversity and habitat due to human activity, including monospecific agriculture and land-use patterns,鈥� they wrote, 鈥渁nd the early-Paleocene low-diversity floral phase may have similarly affected avian communities at that time.鈥�
