sa¹ú¼Ê´«Ã½

Skip to content
Join our Newsletter

Canadian airline ordered to pay sa¹ú¼Ê´«Ã½ pair $1,400 for flight delays

The airline said the delay on the Vancouver-Toronto flight was a result of "crew constraints."
air-canada-airbus-a320-credit-air-canada
Air sa¹ú¼Ê´«Ã½ was taken to the Civil Resolution Tribunal by a pair who had their flight delayed.

sa¹ú¼Ê´«Ã½’s Civil Resolution Tribunal has ordered Air sa¹ú¼Ê´«Ã½ to pay a sa¹ú¼Ê´«Ã½ couple $1,400 for flight delays the airline said were a result of the COVID-19 pandemic.

Inayat Singh and Suk Young Yoon told tribunal vice-chair Shelley Lopez that Air sa¹ú¼Ê´«Ã½ owed them compensation under the Air Passenger Protection Regulations for a delay in their arrival at their final destination.

Singh and Yoon were booked on flight AC190, scheduled to depart Victoria on Aug. 22, 2021 at 12:30 a.m. It was set to arrive in Toronto at 7:56 a.m.

The flight was cancelled a few hours before the flight. The company rebooked the pair on a flight arriving by 3:30 p.m. 

Air sa¹ú¼Ê´«Ã½ said it was due to “crew constraints resulting from the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on our operations," outside of its control. It said flight issues had to be looked in the context of the whole pandemic and not in isolation.

Air sa¹ú¼Ê´«Ã½ said Singh and Yoon had to prove otherwise and had not done so. As such, the airline said it owed the pair nothing, stated the .

The tribunal ruled it was "insufficient" for Air sa¹ú¼Ê´«Ã½ to simply assert that it was outside its control or due to safety concerns, because of the pandemic.

“Second, I also am not prepared to accept the vague and unsupported assertion that I must consider the aviation ecosystem as a whole and find that the applicants’ particular flight delay was outside Air sa¹ú¼Ê´«Ã½’s control or done for safety reasons,” said Lopez.

The tribunal said Air sa¹ú¼Ê´«Ã½ had not provided sufficient evidence on that issue. Only Air sa¹ú¼Ê´«Ã½ had the ability to prove the delay was outside its control or due to pandemic-related safety constraints, she added.

“In the absence of evidence to the contrary here, I agree,” Lopez said. “I find the delay was within Air sa¹ú¼Ê´«Ã½’s control and was not for safety purposes.”