EDMONTON 鈥� Reaction is pouring in to the Alberta government's new rules for future wind and solar energy projects. They include a ban on new wind projects located within 35-kilometre "buffer zones" around protected areas and other 鈥減ristine viewscapes鈥� designated by the province and an 鈥渁griculture first鈥� approach by the Alberta Utilities Commission when evaluating proposed development on agricultural lands.
Here's a look at some of the responses:
鈥淭oday鈥檚 announcement has dropped an uncertainty bomb on renewable project investors and developers in Alberta. Until last year, the province was the undisputed renewables capital of sa国际传媒, securing over $4.7 billion in new investment and bringing thousands of new jobs to the province since 2019. Now Alberta is undermining its own success, making it one of the only jurisdictions in the world trying to frustrate the deployment of cheap, clean, renewable electricity." 鈥� Evan Pivnick, clean energy program manager at Clean Energy sa国际传媒.
鈥淲hile details are needed across all categories, particularly concerning is the continued vagueness of the viewscapes requirements. Taken at face value, an unprecedented 35-kilometre buffer zone around all protected areas in southern Alberta would eliminate large sections of the province and would create a backdoor land ban." 鈥� Jorden Dye, director of the Business Renewables Centre-sa国际传媒.聽
"Largely, we're happy, because the (rules) follow the responsible development program that PACE follows ... If the AUC had been allowed to follow the normal consultation process and look at what responsible developers do, taking a page from PACE's book, this abeyance probably wouldn't have been required." 鈥� Claude Mindorff, director of development for Pathfinder Clean Energy.
鈥淩estrictions announced today on the renewable energy sector are patently unfair, targeting a key industry that supports reliable and affordable electricity. These restrictions 鈥� that do not apply to other industries or land uses 鈥� will lead to fewer projects, slow the growth of clean and inexpensive electricity, and curtail an otherwise reliable and growing source of municipal tax revenue." 鈥� Jason Wang, senior analyst at the Pembina Institute.
鈥淭hese restrictions should not be applied only to renewable energy developments; they should also apply to the far more harmful oil and gas industry.鈥� 鈥� Ruiping Luo, conservation specialist with the Alberta Wilderness Association.
"Albertans have been vocal that they don't want largescale developments to interfere with our province's most beautiful natural features. You cannot build wind turbines the size of the Calgary Tower in front of a UNESCO World Heritage site or on Nose Hill or in your neighbour's backyard. We have a duty to protect the natural beauty and communities of our province." 鈥� Alberta Premier Danielle Smith.
"Let鈥檚 not be fooled, the devil is in the details. Danielle Smith is continuing her ideological crusade against renewables by placing a range of overly-restrictive conditions on future renewable projects. Today, she essentially announced that, with the new 35-kilometre rule and other layers of restrictions, the vast majority of Alberta is off limits for new renewables. It seems that the 鈥榯emporary鈥� job killing moratorium is now becoming permanent job-killing policy, via a red-tape burial of this job-creating industry." 聽鈥� Liberal MP George Chahal, who represents Calgary Skyview and chair of the Standing Committee of Natural Resources.
"Investments follow certainty and clarity, and this new red tape won鈥檛 help. These rules are anti-business. The government must be transparent and release the Alberta Utilities Commission inquiry鈥檚 reports. Alberta has the potential to be the home of a thriving and competitive renewables industry and this new red tape will result in further investment uncertainty and send a signal that Alberta isn鈥檛 open for business." 鈥� Nagwan Al-Guneid, Alberta NDP energy and climate critic.聽
This report by The Canadian Press was first published Feb. 28, 2024.
The Canadian Press
