SACRAMENTO, Calif. (AP) 鈥� Two California counties violated the Constitution's right to keep and bear arms when they shut down gun and ammunition stores in 2020 as nonessential businesses during the coronavirus pandemic, a federal appeals court ruled Thursday.
Officials in Los Angeles and Ventura counties had separately saying gun stores were not exempt from broader shutdown orders aimed at limiting the spread of the coronavirus early in the pandemic.
A three-judge panel of the 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals rejected both lower court rulings.
The Second Amendment 鈥渕eans nothing if the government can prohibit all persons from acquiring any firearm or ammunition,鈥� Judge Lawrence VanDyke wrote. "But that鈥檚 what happened in this case."
Because buyers can obtain guns only by personally going to gun stores in California, Ventura County鈥檚 48-day closure of gun shops, ammunition shops and firing ranges 鈥渨holly prevented law-abiding citizens in the County from realizing their right to keep and bear arms,鈥� .
This, he noted, while bike shops were among those allowed to remain open as essential businesses. The panel adopted the same reasoning in the , though the closure there was for 11 days.
The decision holds that governments "cannot use a crisis to trample on the Constitutional rights of citizens,鈥� said Michael Jean, director of the National Rifle Association's Office of Litigation Counsel that sued in the Los Angeles County case. It also sued Alameda, Contra Costa, Santa Clara and San Mateo counties over their restrictions in Northern California, but the last three were dismissed from the lawsuit when they repealed their orders.
Similar restrictions were imposed in 10 other states, according to the , another gun owners' rights groups that sued: sa国际传媒icut, Georgia, Massachusetts, Michigan, Mississippi, New Jersey, New Mexico, New York, North Carolina and Virginia.
Three gun-owner rights groups and several individuals and businesses had sought to overturn the lower court rulings in California.
Ventura County 鈥渂elieves the case was correctly decided at the District Court level and is disappointed with the three-judge panel鈥檚 decision,鈥� county spokeswoman Ashley Bautista said in an email. Officials are reviewing the decision and 鈥渆valuating our options and next steps.鈥�
Los Angeles County Sheriff Alex Villanueva and Los Angeles Mayor Eric Garcetti, named plaintiffs in the case, did not immediately comment.
Losing parties can generally ask the full 9th Circuit to review the ruling by the three judges, or petition the U.S. Supreme Court. The nation's high court has been deemed more sympathetic to gun owners in recent years.
Firearms Policy Coalition vice president of programs Adam Kraut said in a statement that the cases resulted 鈥渨hen authoritarian governments used COVID as an excuse to attack Second Amendment rights.鈥�
The 9th Circuit opinions "confirm our claims that the COVID closures of gun stores and firing ranges violated the Second Amendment rights of Californians,鈥� he said.
Don Thompson, The Associated Press
