sa国际传媒

Skip to content
Join our Newsletter

Injured Copperfield trick participant loses lawsuit appeal

LAS VEGAS (AP) 鈥 The Nevada Supreme Court has upheld a jury鈥檚 findings that illusionist David Copperfield and the MGM Grand hotel-casino were not financially responsible for a British tourist鈥檚 injuries during a signature vanishing act at a Las Vegas
20220415150428-6259c8253c9fbbc3659ffa7ajpeg
FILE - Gavin Cox holds his wife Minh-Hahn Cox as they wait for the jury's decision in his trial against illusionist David Copperfield at the Regional Justice Center in Las Vegas on Tuesday, May 29, 2018. The Nevada Supreme Court has upheld a jury鈥檚 findings that illusionist David Copperfield and the MGM Grand weren't financially responsible for a British tourist鈥檚 injuries during a Las Vegas Strip show in 2013. (Rachel Aston/Las Vegas Review-Journal via AP)

LAS VEGAS (AP) 鈥 The Nevada Supreme Court has upheld a jury鈥檚 findings that illusionist David Copperfield and the MGM Grand hotel-casino were not financially responsible for a British tourist鈥檚 injuries during a signature vanishing act at a Las Vegas Strip show in 2013.

Gavin Cox and his wife, Minh-Hahn Cox, alleged that the multimillionaire magician, the hotel, two Copperfield business entities and a construction firm that was renovating the hotel caused permanent brain injuries for Cox when he fell while taking part in the trick as a randomly picked audience member.

In a complex verdict reached in May 2018 after several weeks of testimony, the jury found Copperfield, the hotel and Copperfield鈥檚 company, Backstage Disappearing Inc., negligent but not civilly liable for Cox鈥檚 fall.

Cox had sought hundreds of thousands of dollars in medical costs and damages, but jurors found him responsible for his own injuries and he received no money.

Brian Harris, attorney for the couple, noted Friday that the court split 5-2 on its ruling, issued Thursday.

鈥淗ad the dissenting opinion been shared by the majority, our clients would be looking at a new trial,鈥 Harris said. 鈥淲e are disappointed we won鈥檛 have that opportunity.鈥

Five justices rejected Harris' argument that the trial judge should not have allowed attorneys for the hotel to show jurors surveillance videos of Cox walking with apparent ease to court with his dog on a leash.

In the courtroom, jurors saw Cox helped to the witness stand by his attorney or court officers. He testified that he needed assistance when not in court.

Copperfield鈥檚 illusion, dubbed 鈥渢he runaround鈥 by stagehands, appeared to make as many as 13 audience volunteers disappear onstage and reappear moments later in the back of the theater.

The jury heard that in less than 90 seconds, stagehands with flashlights ushered the audience members offstage through dark curtains, down passageways, outdoors and then indoors through a kitchen to re-enter the theater for the show鈥檚 finale.

At trial, Cox鈥檚 lawyer told the jury that hotel renovation work had left construction dust coating an alley that the group ran through.

Ken Ritter, The Associated Press