JUNEAU, Alaska (AP) 鈥� A federal judge on Thursday upheld the Biden administration鈥檚 approval of the Willow oil-drilling project on Alaska鈥檚 remote North Slope, a massive project that drew the ire of environmentalists who had accused the president of backpedaling on his pledge to combat climate change.
U.S. District Court Judge Sharon Gleason rejected requests by a grassroots I帽upiat group and environmentalists to vacate the approval, and she dismissed their claims against the project, which is in the federally designated National Petroleum Reserve-Alaska.
The company has the right to develop its oil and gas leases in the reserve 鈥渟ubject to reasonable restrictions and mitigation measures imposed by the federal government,鈥� Gleason wrote. She added that the alternatives analyzed by the U.S. Bureau of Land Management as part of its review were consistent with the policy objectives of the petroleum reserve and the stated purpose and need of the Willow project.
The decision can be appealed.
The groups that sued over the project raised concerns about planet-warming greenhouse gas emissions from Willow and argued that federal agencies failed to consider how increased emissions from the project could affect ice-reliant species such as the polar bear, Arctic ringed seals and bearded seals, which already are experiencing disruptions due to climate change.
Erik Grafe, an attorney with Earthjustice, who was involved in one of the cases, called the ruling disappointing but said 鈥渨e are entirely confident in our claims, and are considering all legal options including an appeal to the higher court.鈥�
Bridget Psarianos, an attorney with Trustees for Alaska, which represents Sovereign Inupiat for a Living Arctic and several environmental groups in the other lawsuit, called Gleason's decision 鈥渂ad news not just for our clients but for anyone who cares about the climate and future generations.鈥�
鈥淭here is too much at stake to gloss over the harm this project will do,鈥� Psarianos said. "We will remain standfast in working with our clients to protect the Arctic from this devastating project today and in the weeks, months, and years ahead.鈥�
The project has widespread political support in Alaska. But climate activists said allowing it to go forward marked a major breach of President Joe Biden鈥檚 campaign promise to The administration's action alienated and outraged some supporters, particularly young activists who launched a TikTok campaign to oppose the project ahead of its approval in March.
ConocoPhillips Alaska had proposed five drilling sites, but the Bureau of Land Management approved three, which it said would include up to 199 total wells. The project could produce up to 180,000 barrels of oil a day at its peak. Using that oil would produce the equivalent of at least 263 million tons (239 million metric tons) of over Willow鈥檚 projected 30-year life.
The administration has defended its climate record, and Interior Secretary Deb Haaland earlier this year called Willow 鈥渁 very long and complicated and difficult decision to make,鈥欌�� noting that ConocoPhillips Alaska has long held leases in the region and that regulators tried to balance drilling rights with a project that was narrower in scope.
Interior declined to comment on Gleason's decision Thursday.
Connor Dunn, vice president of the Willow project for ConocoPhillips Alaska, said in court documents that it was 鈥渉ighly unlikely鈥� that Willow would proceed if the administration鈥檚 approval were to be vacated.
Many of the company鈥檚 leases in the area date to 1999 and are at risk of expiring by Sept. 1, 2029, if oil hasn鈥檛 been produced by then, Dunn said. There is no guarantee the company, which through July had invested about $925 million in Willow, would get an extension on its leases, he said.
In April, Gleason rejected efforts to halt cold-weather construction work by ConocoPhillips Alaska while litigation was pending, including mining gravel and using it for a road toward the project. That work ended in May. The company has been doing preparation work ahead of planned pre-packing snow for ice road construction for this winter, spokesperson Rebecca Boys said.
The project has been mired in litigation for years.
A prior authorization of Willow, issued in 2020 during the Trump administration, called for allowing ConocoPhillips to establish up to three drill sites, with the potential for two more proposed by the company to be considered later.
after finding that the federal review underpinning the decision was flawed and did not include mitigation measures for polar bears. The ruling led to a new environmental analysis and the Biden administration鈥檚 greenlight in March for what Justice Department attorneys had said was a scaled-back version that resolved concerns raised by Gleason.
Many and groups with ties to the region have argued that Willow is economically vital for their communities. Republican Gov. Mike Dunleavy, the state鈥檚 bipartisan congressional delegation and labor unions have touted Willow as a job creator in a state where major existing oil fields are aging and production is a small fraction of what it once was.
鈥淭oday鈥檚 ruling gives us hope for our collective future on the North Slope and in Alaska,鈥� said Nagruk Harcharek, president of the group Voice of Arctic I帽upiat, whose members include leaders from across much of the North Slope region. 鈥淕oing forward, we hope that key decision makers in the Biden administration and in Congress listen to the voices of those who know these lands better than anyone else: the North Slope I帽upiat.鈥�
Some Alaska Native leaders in the community nearest the project, Nuiqsut, have expressed concerns about impacts to their subsistence lifestyles and have said their concerns were ignored.
Becky Bohrer, The Associated Press
