A commentary by a Saanich resident.
Decisions made by Saanich council have profound impacts on our families, our neighbourhoods and our communities. Therefore, it is imperative that both councillors and constituents have a clear perception of the factors that determine council’s decision.
Accountability in government must always be a priority. The purpose of a lobbyist registry is to build confidence in government through transparency. According to the Canadian Bar Association, a registry regulates the activities of paid lobbyists to prevent the influencing of public officials.
In response to the motion to investigate what is required to establish a lobbyist registry, Saanich Coun. Zac de Vries stated there is no “shortage of issues to be addressed,” and that there are limited resources by which to address those issues.
Issues, however, will never be in short supply and the availability of resources is likely to be of ongoing concern. So, how, exactly, do those considerations deter council from disclosing which lobbyists may want to influence council and the reasons on which council’s decisions are predicated?
De Vries observed that there have not been any complaints to council about a lack of registry, nor has there been correspondence suggesting that it is a good idea.
I have not complained to council about a lack of a registry, nor have I corresponded to suggest that it is a good idea, but that does not mean that I would not support its implementation.
Coun. Karen Harper referenced the availability of “tools” such as the freedom of information legislation and Elections sa国际传媒 reports to satisfy queries about political donations.
This suggestion is not as helpful as it may appear, as information is not always provided in a user-friendly manner. More important, neither addresses the private influence on public officials at various types of venues and gatherings.
I also think there is a significant difference between me talking to a councillor and having that interpreted as “lobbying” as compared with paid lobbyists who promote individual business or corporate interests that may compromise a greater good.
As conflict of interest is of primary concern, a lobbyist registry is a sound first step towards increased accountability.
In addition, there should be a broader inclusivity that allows for members of the public to report whenever an applicant and/or council member can unfairly benefit from an affiliation that has not been disclosed.
Disclosure by council members should be compulsory and enforced; and if the requirement for disclosure has not been met, there should be a consequence sufficient to deter future non-compliance.
Briefly stated, full disclosure and transparency are always in the best interest of constituents, as these things can expose connections and agendas to public scrutiny and discussion.
>>> To comment on this article, write a letter to the editor: [email protected]
