Plebiscite, plebiscite, plebiscite before Games
Re: 鈥淗osting 2026 Games will bring major benefits to sa国际传媒,鈥� commentary, Feb. 17.
We neither support or oppose the region hosting any mega sporting event such as the 2026 Commonwealth Games.
But we believe before a billion-plus dollars is spent 鈥� mostly taxpayer 颅dollars 鈥� that all the facts including costs, benefits, obligations and risks for such a large-scale event must be on the table for residents to consider.
There must also be a rigorous business plan made public and critiqued by an independent third party.
That didn鈥檛 happen a few years ago when a Commonwealth Games bid was floated, rather initial support was garnered in secret around the Capital Regional District table and endorsed without the public weighing in. The province wisely declined to provide financial support and eventually the bid fell apart.
Contrary to the pitch by proponents, municipalities and local citizens will most certainly have to fund part of the budget.
The pandemic, and now uncertainty around several COVID-19 variants, have resulted in extremely challenging and uncertain economic times with many critical and competing priorities. All of us will indirectly pay through taxes as 颅residents of sa国际传媒 and sa国际传媒.
Any dream of bidding for the 2026 Commonwealth Games must be done with full transparency and first be approved by 颅residents through a regional plebiscite.
Stan Bartlett, past chair
Grumpy Taxpayer$ of Greater Victoria
Tracing the roots of cancelling others
Re: 鈥淲arning of cancel culture is 颅hypocritical,鈥� letter, Feb. 18.
This argument suitable for five-year-olds on the playground opposed the sa国际传媒鈥檚 own editorial against cancel culture in sa国际传媒.
Asserted a geography professor at the University of Victoria that because the people being cancelled now were themselves cancellers of others in their day, and in a very bad way, so we should be cancellers too, and expunge them from the public space.
What鈥檚 poison for the goose should be sauce for us ganders, goes this argument.
Here鈥檚 another argument: Were the Indigenous Peoples proposed as victims not themselves victimizers who cancelled, as in wiped out or enslaved, each others鈥� tribes when they could?
You started it! No you did!
Steve Weatherbe
Victoria
Academic bigotry is a bigger problem
Re: 鈥淲arning of cancel culture is 颅hypocritical,鈥� letter, Feb. 18.
Not all of us attribute the sins of our less-than-correct ancestors to the evils of their white and right-winginess.
Isn鈥檛 it time to quit these rigid terms?
The University of Victoria professor of geography鈥檚 aversion to idolatry in bronze has some merit, but of greater concern is the academic bigotry so 颅prevalent in our centres of education.
These epicentres of correctness seem oblivious to the consequences of institutional tampering. Anyone familiar with the internet can attest to search blocking from algorithms designed to favour and promote certain political points of view.
If these electronic Talibans or 颅attitudinal Mafias don鈥檛 strike you as components of the same Group Think trends, then we are all in trouble.
Surely our tenured guardians of intellectual freedom can recognize that we are off course. Can it be that they are too impressed with themselves to realize tectonic shifts in technology have made everyone susceptible to misdirection?
There is an awakening gathering to combat these dangers, but I doubt if the anointed are allowed to speak of such things.
Russell Thompson
Victoria
Anti-Canadian history on campus
Re: 鈥淲arning of cancel culture is 颅hypocritical,鈥� letter, Feb. 18.
One of the University of Victoria鈥檚 颅cultural geographers seems to believe that critiquing cancel culture is just 鈥渢he tunnel vision of Eurocentrism鈥� and 鈥渞ight-wing talking points.鈥�
One would expect this esteemed 颅professor to be a little more nuanced in his interpretations of history and 颅freedom of speech than simply claiming that critiques of cancel culture can be distilled down to 鈥渨hite man, bad.鈥�
As an American-born citizen, he doesn鈥檛 seem to realize that sa国际传媒 has been built by 鈥� and not just 鈥渙n the backs of鈥� 鈥� people of multiple ethnic and racial backgrounds.
I can only guess that his lack of historical nuance had something to do with him leading the charge to take down Victoria鈥檚 statue of Sir John A. Macdonald in 2018.
It seems to me the more 颅pertinent question to ask is why our local 颅university hired what appears to be a race-obsessed American to teach an anti-Canadian 颅history.
Mark Hecht, MCP
(Taught cultural geography at Mount Royal University for more than a decade)
Victoria
We cannot erase our shared history
Re: 鈥淲arning of cancel culture is 颅hypocritical,鈥� letter, Feb. 18.
Cancel culture is a soft euphemism for doing away with history. History cannot be erased.
It stands forever; it happened. It聽should be celebrated as a series of road maps telling us how far we have come and perhaps how far we have yet to travel to become better than those who came before us.
Those who would cancel culture would have us believe that we who now inhabit this planet are the only right-thinking persons and that we must forever atone for wrongs perpetrated in the past.
We cannot do so if there is no history to atone for.
P.G. (Phil) Leith
Victoria
Macdonald statue was also cancelled
Letters about cancel culture bring to mind the status of our statue of John A. Macdonald. I recall there were statements about seeking another locations for this excellent piece.
If only the cancellers (councillors) had looked a little deeper into the life of our first prime minister, they would have learned about just how much he 颅accomplished in protecting the rights of Indigenous people.
Where is that fine statue?
Michael Fox
Colwood
Cancelled white men helped bring freedom
Re: 鈥淲arning of cancel culture is 颅hypocritical,鈥� letter, Feb. 18.
Moral outrage does not constitute rational argument. This is one of the major problems with cancel culture, and it is on full display in the letter by a University of Victoria professor. Not only that, the 颅letter has sexist and racial overtones.
The positive contributions to our civilization of such 鈥渨hite, European men鈥� as John A. Macdonald, Abraham Lincoln, Winston Churchill, and Captain James Cook, all of whom have been cancelled, are so significant and have produced such free (for all races and sexual orientations), enlightened, and democratic societies that it is embarrassing to have to point this out to a member of the 颅academy. Yet somebody must.
However, I commend the professor鈥檚 courage for writing and will defend to my last breath the right of dispute in our democracy, whose philosophical framework (John Locke, Thomas Hobbes et al) and defence in the Second World War against fascism were achieved primarily by astute, selfless and honourable people of many ethnicities, Indigenous, 颅Caucasian and Black men among them.
Brad Bird
Parksville
Leave the Goose, fix the streets instead
Recent proposals to widen the Galloping Goose are a valuable contribution to an important public debate. But it seems as if the trend is to turn what was originally a walking trail into a roadway not much different from a city street.
But wait, isn鈥檛 there already a vast 颅network of city streets, currently dedicated to automobile use?
Surely the time has come to reassign some of those to meet the ever-growing needs of pedestrians and cyclists.
We could start with parts of Government Street. A well-planned network of repurposed pedestrian/cyclist commuter roadways could follow.
Leave the Goose as it is. Use those apparently available millions of dollars for a program to redevelop existing city streets to meet the real needs of the 21st聽century. The future beckons.
Tom Masters
Chemainus
Plenty of room to share the Goose
Re: 鈥淭rail-widening great, but let鈥檚 start with etiquette,鈥� commentary, Feb. 18.
According to Patricia Coppard, the 颅Galloping Goose is frequented by 鈥渟peed freaks鈥� and 鈥榡erks gripping handlebars.鈥� Under the guise of 鈥渁ctively promoting trail etiquette,鈥� she wants taxpayers to install hundreds of speed limit signs.
Eventually, she would like it if 鈥渆xperienced cycle commuters don鈥檛 use the Goose at all.鈥� This isn鈥檛 trail etiquette, this is heavy-handed restriction, 颅bordering on oppression.
I ride to work on the Goose more than 200聽days a year, and have done so for almost a decade. I鈥檝e passed about 10,000 other trail users with precisely zero crashes. You can call me a 鈥渟peed freak,鈥� but don鈥檛 claim that I鈥檓 dangerous. And I鈥檓 not alone.
According to Capital Regional District bike counts, there are 900,000 annual bike rides on the Goose. I am not aware of a single reported collision between a cyclist and pedestrian. Not one!
This suggests millions of peaceful passes occur for every imagined crash. Meanwhile, cyclists continue to be seriously injured at the five level crossings between Tolmie Road and Culduthel Road.
If we agree that enhanced safety is the goal, let鈥檚 consider improvements to the lighting, sight lines, trail surface and 颅signage at these vehicle intersections.
I accept that pedestrians, dog walkers and leisurely cyclists have a place on the Goose. I would prefer they avoid the most congested areas during rush hour. Nonetheless, bikes have brakes, people have voices, and we can all find room to move.
Graeme Sykes
Saanich
Common sense and courtesy are needed
Re: 鈥淭rail-widening great, but let鈥檚 start with etiquette,鈥� commentary, Feb. 18.
Thanks, Patricia Coppard, for an excellent column on a sensible solution to Galloping Goose and Lochside congestion.
As an avid cyclist, I have noticed a steady increase in conflicts on the trails recently, particularly now with the pandemic dramatically increasing the traffic.
My experience before moving here five years ago was as a bike commuter in Calgary for 25 years, where I also saw conflicts increase on those narrow river pathways.
The main reason, as Coppard so eloquently described, is due to speeding and aggressive cyclists who should either stick to the roads or comply with trail etiquette.
Also, to all the newbie riders on electric bikes, please realize that the motor pushing your bike is also pushing the limits of your abilities. I have seen many inexperienced riders exceeding their ability to avoid unexpected situations due to excessive speed.
Coppard mentions the walkers in groups and dog walkers. It would help everyone sharing the trail if you would try to keep to one side.
Dog walkers, please consider keeping your dogs on short leashes on the side away from the centre, where conflict can occur.
Cyclists ride by the walkers at a 颅reasonable speed and call out or ring well in advance so they won鈥檛 be startled.
If everyone used common sense and courtesy we could all enjoy the trail 颅systems before widening and separation.
Mark Barnes
Saanich
Was Clover Point a busy place in 1821?
I am trying to imagine what the First Nations people thought of what is now 颅Clover Point back in 1821, and hundreds if not thousands of years before that.
Did they prepare and eat meals there? Did they gather their elders, babies, and disabled among them, and haul them down to the water鈥檚 edge to witness Mother Nature鈥檚 fury?
No, in all likelihood, most probably avoided Clover Point on typical days, because being exposed to the often-harsh elements there wasn鈥檛 a journey worth partaking in.
So, here we are in 2021. A paved route and dozens of parking spots for 颅automobiles was established at Clover Point in 1956.
Literally millions of visits to Clover Point by automobile have taken place in the last 65 years. What is the problem here?
Mayor Lisa Helps, and many who make up the Victoria city council, demonstrably hate automobiles, plain and simple.
Imagine what they would do if they had control over Saxe Point, Esquimalt Lagoon, Oak Bay Marina, Cattle Point, Mount Tolmie and Mount Douglas.
A few years ago, Saanich decided to prohibit automobile access to the top of Mount Douglas before the noon hour so that the healthy and fit among us could make that road an exclusive hiking and cycling trail, at least for the first half of the day.
There is a cheap compromise to be had at Clover Point, and Lisa Helps and council should look to the Mount Douglas model that Saanich has successfully implemented for guidance.
Trevor Amon
Victoria
SEND US YOUR LETTERS
鈥� Email letters to: [email protected]
鈥� Mail: Letters to the editor, sa国际传媒, 201-655 Tyee Rd., Victoria, sa国际传媒 V9A 6X5
鈥� Submissions should be no more than 250 words; subject to editing for length and clarity. Provide your contact information; it will not be published.
