sa国际传媒

Skip to content
Join our Newsletter

Trevor Hancock: What if we base decisions on what's good for nature and community?

We created Conversations for a One Planet Region with one simple mission: To establish and maintain community-wide conversations on one-planet living and a one-planet region.
TC_86392_web_VKA-windy-8449.jpg
Toxic values we need to change include seeing nature as apart from us and simply there for our use and profit, rather than something in which we are deeply embedded, a life-support system we share with all other life forms, writes Trevor Hancock. DARREN STONE, TIMES COLONIST

We created Conversations for a One Planet Region with one simple mission: To establish and maintain community-wide conversations on one-planet living and a one-planet region.

Our concern is likewise very simple: We may be talking about and even acting on 颅climate change 鈥 even though our actions usually fall short of our words 鈥 but we are not yet talking seriously about the far greater challenge of living as if we have four or five planets, when in reality, we only have one, never mind the implications of that realisation.

This is both a practical and a profound ethical challenge. In practical terms, we need to reduce our ecological footprint by 75 or 80 per cent, because we are taking far more than our fair share of the Earth鈥檚 颅limited biocapacity and resources.

This is where the ethical challenge comes in: In taking more than our fair share, we are inflicting an injustice on others around the world who get far less than their fair share, on future generations whose 鈥渋nheritance鈥 we are consuming, and on other species whose habitats and means of life we destroy.

Over time, we have come to see these ethical challenges as rooted in a wider frame of societal values that are best described as toxic: They are incompatible with sustaining life, health, society and nature over the long haul. So we need to change our core value set.

Among the toxic values we need to change are the excessive valuing of individualism to the neglect or even denial of the 颅collective and our responsibilities towards the 颅community; greed and materialism, so that success is measured solely in terms of how much wealth and stuff you have rather than the quality of life you lead; and seeing nature as apart from us and simply there for our use and profit, rather than something in which we are deeply embedded, a life-support system we share with all other life forms.

These are the three forms of disconnection that Jeremy Lent identifies in his 2017 book The Patterning Instinct.

He suggests they lie at the heart of the global challenges we are creating and are 鈥渋nexorably leading human civilization to potential disaster.鈥 So we have been 颅exploring these ideas in our fall online 颅Conversations series: What are the 颅implications for our actions and policies if we place the valuing of nature, community and quality of life at the heart of our 颅thinking and decisions? (We explore the final one, valuing quality of life, on Dec. 10.)

We see all this in a wider frame of cultural evolution, a concept we take from Joe Brewer and the Center for Applied Cultural Evolution. They define cultural evolution as simply the extension of Darwin鈥檚 concept of evolution 鈥渢o the domains of social behaviours, practices, tools, and structures.鈥 So how do we evolve to a culture that is fit for purpose in the 21st century, faced with the realities of ecological limits and social inequity?

Thus our task, which turns out to be Herculean, is to evolve a local culture and set of values here in the Greater Victoria region that shifts our community 鈥 all its people, organisations and institutions, including, of course, its economy 鈥 to one that has an ecological footprint equivalent to One Planet (our fair share), while ensuring a good 颅quality of life for all 鈥 all 鈥 who live here.

Of course, we can鈥檛 to that alone, as a small and almost penniless organization. But then, we aren鈥檛 trying to. We want to work with any and all who share some or all of our hopes (and fears). We want to stimulate 颅discussion and put this issue on the social and political agenda as the greatest challenge we face today 鈥 but one with many 颅opportunities for a richer and better life.

This is, in many ways, similar to the 颅challenges faced as we evolved from 颅agrarian and aristocratic societies to 颅industrialised and democatic societies in the 19th and early 20th centuries. This has led us to the concept of 鈥渂ildung鈥 鈥 personal and cultural/societal maturation 鈥 and its 颅application in the 颅Nordic countries through 鈥渇olk鈥 or adult public education.

I will discuss this, and its relevance to today, in the coming weeks.